Botanical
Sources, purportedly operating of Rome, Italy; is selling
fraudulent "herbal remedies" for serious illnesses. How do I know this? Because I see the patterns. I read between
the lines and I know. ...KNOW that some of the claims they make are patently
untrue. If some claims are false, how can you trust ANY of their claims? You can't. So don't waste your money.
Here's how I
know:
First off,
Botanical Sources (BS -appropriately enough) is one of the three companies that
SPAH -which has been previously outed here as a scam, uses consistently as
an option where BS has a um... "remedy" available.
Although -let's face it-, it is probably all
the same remedy repackaged 185 times and it could consist of weeds, cat poo and talc and still fall under
the "100% natural" guarantee. Because legally: 100% natural means squat. "Certified organic" means something. "wholegrain"
means something. But 100% natural means it 100% originated in nature.
Rocks, bark, dirt, maggots, hairballs and poo are all 100% natural too, but I'm not
planning to go out into my backyard and chow down on any of those in an
attempt to cure ...anything. Except maybe my life. They might cure me of that.
BS's "shtick"
is a supposed (very
tenuous) association with something a guy from the Mayo Clinic once
said. There is no association between BS and the Mayo at all. If
you read the carefully worded text, they say
"A
unique Mayo Clinic collaboration has revived the healing wisdom of Pacific
Island cultures by testing a therapeutic plant extract..."
...and they
go on to cite an article from Science Daily which itself sound like
a bunch of baloney. About Science Daily (from
Wikipedia) "Some have criticized the site's refusal to provide links to the
specific release on which each article is based, and its decision to list
instead the home page of the institution responsible for the release--a
practice that makes it difficult for researchers and interested laymen to cite
and consult the actual scientific paper discussed."
Some plants have healing
properties and you can make drugs from plants.
SHOCKER!
HOLD THE
FUCKIN FRONT PAGE! We didn't know what, did we? We didn't know
that Aspirin came from willow, and morphine came from poppies and that MANY
medicines used today are synthesized versions of plant compounds. Or just the
compounds themselves.
Oh.
You know
that already?
But there IS
more. How about this for a breakthrough:
If you study indigenous people and their natural remedies, or if we "accidentally" wiped out those indigenous people years ago; if you go back over old writings of the people who originally studied and documented those indigenous people (before they were accidentally wiped out), you might learn about "new" medical compounds which the indigenous people knew about for centuries.
WOW!
Whoda thunk
it?
...whaddyamean
EVERYONE?
And because someone in the Mayo clinic
points out that this is pretty fuckin obvious,
BS now seems to think; - through no connection whatsoever with Science daily
that I know -except that they read it at least once, -or the Mayo
clinic; -except they have heard of it; is that this means they can sell
whateverthefuck
they please to the unsuspecting and desperate sick person, based on
something somebody once said about plants being a good potential source of
healing compounds.
House. of. Cards.
You're being
too harsh, OSM I hear you say.
You've just
blasted your own argument and come in a complete circle! I hear others say. OSM, You say that plants can heal is obvious, and
in the next breath, you tell us NOT to believe Botanical Sources?
No. I haven't
contradicted myself. Let me clarify:
- I COMPLETELY believe that some plants have
healing properties.
- I also
believe that old style medicine can definitely help some people. I don't
believe Western medicine is the be-all and end-all.
- However, I
also believe in research and double-blind studies.
- And in a specifically targeted, rather than a carpet-bomb approach to cures.
- I also
believe in knowing the source of anything you put in your mouth.
- I also
believe -nay- I KNOW that many of the claims BS makes ( and they don't make
too many claims, actually. They tell you to try the product for yourself. Then
once they get your money, do you think you will get it back? Google Botanical Sources and "ripoff"
and get back to me on that one.) -I know many of the claims they make just
CANNOT be true.
For
example, one of their products: Porpharex,
claims to be a "unique porphyria product" then parrots some general
mumbo-jumbo about herbs and plants in medicine (asks you to click for more) ...then more
general stuff about herbs -nothing specific to Porphyria- They mention an anti-cancer
treatment (porphyria is not a cancer)...
oh wait...
here come the claims
Following FDA and DSHEA guidelines at
all stages of development we are now able to present what we believe is the
most proven, effective, safe and easy to use product for healing Porphyria and
titled it Porpharex.
Sound goods,
right?
Here's the
problem.
Porphyria is
not a disease. The Porphyrias are a
group of diseases. There are at least eight of them, falling into two separate
groups and each one of the eight has a
different underlying mechanism.
In short, if
you have "porphyria" you can have one of at least EIGHT things broken
in you. And this single remedy is going to automatically hone in on whichever one of the eight
enzyme deficiencies a given person has, and not do any harm to the healthy
seven? Ummm hmmm...
And what
about the known fact that one of the things all EIGHT types of porphyria patients
have in common, is that they are horribly sensitive to certain drugs and other
compounds. Sometimes the worst thing you can do to a prophyric is attempt to treat him (or
her).
So let's have
a look at the list of 100% natural" components that BS plan to give to
someone with any (all) kind(s) of porphyria -some
of which can be fatal BTW. OK. Let's
not. I got as far as "Sulphur"
and I stopped.
Here's why. This is taken from this site:
Dietary Notes regarding Sulphur /
Sulfur
Sulfas, sulphites and sulphurs are contraindicated for porphyria patients.
One does need to look at food labeling to know what are sulphur based products.
If you want to avoid sulfur-based preservatives, these are the names to
watch for:
Sulfur Dioxide
Sodium Sulfite
Sodium Bisulfite
Sodium Metabisulfite
Potassium Bisulfite
Potassium Metabisulfite
Many
commonly used products at home contained some of the above ingredients.
Many of these products are medicinals.
Sulfur
is used to treat many kinds of skin disorders and is contained in cream,
lotion, ointment, and bar soaps. It is also found in numerous ointments.
So people with porphyria are warned
to keep away from all sulphur -even in soap!
Yet, Botanical
Sources, AKA BS are proposing that
people with porphyria should EAT sulphur, (at least you can wash it off your
skin!). What is this, some kind unmonitored aversion therapy?
Or maybe ...just maybe ...it's a SCAM?
Of course it's a bloody scam!
Not only are BS
full of BS, they are dangerous.
Please don't
buy any of their products (listed below)
Condition |
Product |
Abdominal Adhesions |
|
Acanthosis Nigricans |
|
Acrocyanosis |
|
Acute Broncitis |
|
Adenopathy |
|
Adrenoleukodystrophy |
|
Agalactia (lack of breast milk) |
|
Alkaptonuria (genetic) |
|
ameloblastoma |
|
Anginoedema (hereditary) |
|
Angionma |
|
Antiphospholipid Syndrome |
|
Aquagenic Pruritus |
|
Arachnoid cysts |
|
Ascites |
|
Asthma |
|
Atherosclerosis |
|
Athlete's foot |
|
Atrial Fibrillation |
|
Azospermia |
|
Behcet's Syndrome |
|
Bell's palsy |
|
Benign essential blaphasospasm |
http://blepharax.com/ingredients.html
(the links say bomarax and burning mouth syndrome, although the addy is
correct) |
Benign essential tremor |
|
Blepharitis |
|
Blisters |
|
Blood in the Semen |
|
Bone and Joint Tuberculosis |
|
Bone Degeneration |
|
Bowen's Disease |
|
Breath odor |
|
Bronchiectasis |
|
Bulima |
|
Bullous pemphigoid |
|
Burning mouth syndrome |
|
Canker sore |
|
Carbunkles |
|
Carcinoid syndrome |
|
Cardiomyopathy |
|
Cataract |
|
Cellulitis |
|
Cervical spine ( i.e.
"neck"!) |
|
Cervical Spondylosis |
|
Chloracne |
|
Chordoma |
|
Cluster Headache |
|
Condyloma |
|
Congestive Heart Failure |
|
Cronkhite-Canada syndrome |
|
Cushings disease |
|
Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome |
|
Dandruff |
|
Dark Circles |
|
Dermatomyositis |
|
Drematofibroma |
|
Dyshidrosis |
|
Eczema |
|
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) |
|
emphysema |
|
Enlarged Tonsils |
|
Epididymitis |
|
Erysipelas |
|
Erythroderma |
|
Erythromelalgia |
|
Eyelid ptosis |
|
Fahr's Disease |
|
Flatulence |
|
Folliculitis |
|
Formaldehyde poisoning |
|
Friedreich's Ataxia |
|
Frozen shoulder |
|
Ganglion |
|
Gastritis |
|
Gastro paresis |
|
Gilbert's Syndrome |
|
Glaucoma |
|
Globus hystericus |
|
Gonorrhea |
|
Granuloma annulare |
|
Grave's disease |
|
Grover's Disease |
|
Guillain-Barre Syndrome |
|
gynecomastia |
|
Hand tremors |
|
Hearing loss |
|
Hemmorhoids (what, no Pileen?) |
|
Hepatic Hemangioma |
|
Hereditary Fructose Intolerence |
|
Hidradenitis Suppurativa |
|
Hives |
utitec! (not hives) |
Hookworm |
|
Horner's Syndrome |
|
Hydrocele |
|
hydrocephalus |
|
Hydronephrosis |
|
Hypertension |
|
Hypertensive retinopathy |
|
Hypotension |
|
Ichthyosis |
|
Impetigo |
|
Inclusion body myositis (IBM) |
|
Jock itch |
|
Keloids |
|
Keratoacanthoma |
|
Leg ulcers |
|
Lennox Gastaut Syndrome |
|
Lichen Planus |
|
Lichen Simplex Chronicus |
|
Lipoma |
|
Liver cirrhosis |
|
Liver cyst |
|
Lymphadenitis |
|
Malabsorption |
|
Molluscum Contagiosum |
|
Motor Neuron Disease |
|
Multiple System Athrophy |
|
Muscular Dystrophy |
|
Muscular Fasciculation |
|
Myasthenia Gravis |
|
Myelitis |
|
Narcolepsy |
|
Nasal Polyps (Note Correct
Spelling) |
|
Optic atrophy |
|
Osteomyelitis |
|
Pancreatitis |
|
Parkinsonism |
|
Pemphigus |
|
Peripheral Neuropathy |
|
Peyronie's Disease |
|
photodermatitis |
|
Photosensitivity |
|
Pityriasis Alba |
|
Pityriasis Roseca |
|
Pityriasis Rubra |
|
Polycystic Kidney Disease |
|
Polycythemia Vera |
|
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) |
|
Porphyria (All 6 kinds?) |
|
Post-Polio Syndrome |
|
Premature Gray Hair |
|
Pressure Ulcer |
|
Prickly heat |
|
Prostatitis |
|
Pruritus Ani |
|
PseudoTumor Cerebri |
cerebrax (not available) |
Raynauds Syndrome |
|
Rectal prolapse |
|
Reiter's Syndrome |
|
Renal Failure |
|
Retinitis Pigmentosa |
|
Ringworm |
|
Rosacea |
|
Salivary Duct Stones |
|
Scabies |
|
Scleroderma |
|
Sebaceous Cyst |
|
Seborrheic Keratosis |
|
Sensitive Teeth |
|
Shingles |
|
Sjogrens Syndrome |
|
Skin Tags |
|
Spasmodic Dysphonia |
|
Spider Veins |
|
Stroke (...REALLY?) |
|
Sunburn (check the privacy policy) |
|
Syringomyelia |
|
Teething troubles |
|
Temporomandibular Joint Syndrome |
|
Thalassemia minor |
|
Thrombocythemia |
|
Thyroid Nodule |
|
Tick Bite |
|
Tinea |
|
Tinea Versicolor |
|
Tinnitus |
|
Trigenimenal Neuralgia |
|
Trimethylaminuria |
|
Ulcerative Colitis |
|
Urethritis |
|
Urticaria |
|
Urticaria Pigmentosa |
|
Uterine Fibroids |
|
Uveitis |
|
Vocal Cord Nodules |
|
Warts |
|
Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome |
Because these scams are so over the top I keep waiting for one of them to have a cure of Poland's Syndrome, but I guess it's either too rare or too obviously not fixable without surgery.
I think that's what makes these so sad, it's not in your face obviously fake, but it's for half a moment believable fake to people to have lost hope that they will get better or who've lost home in medical science.
Posted by: queen-slug | September 09, 2009 at 08:55 AM
Wow, thank you for this info. Sometimes you can just "feel" that a website is not right, and that is how I felt about didmorax.com...its a shame people out there feel the need to exploit people looking for help.
Posted by: JP | October 27, 2009 at 01:48 PM
Wow. I've spent the last day reading your site, and don't know whether to scream or cry.
I landed here after I was asked my opinion on the postpolio supplement. Before checking the site I advised it was 99% likely to be bogus internet marketing shit.
But this is a new level of level of scary dangerous.
Before I was pissed off at $40 e-books claiming to cure the untreatable with baking soda and apple cider vinegar. That was so lame that even a techno challenged me could download without actually paying. In comparison, that was benign (although I was astounded that anyone would blatently rip off sick and vulnerable people.
As aherbalist I thought vI should recognise the ingredients, but half I don't. The combinations are wrong and the doses random. Funny how they seem to have the same 27.62 mg of most herbal ingredients. Ths would be about 1% of a therapeutic dose for many herbs like liquorice (glycyrrhiza)
FYI the Linn you queried elsewhere is the Linnaeus classification of plants - obviously they directly copied from some source. Homeopathics such as Nux Vomica should have a dilution number, not a mg value.
You write and research so well I thought WEB MD would respond, although I had surmised they were just an internet scam site anyway.
But your efforts need to be acted upon, so go the person with power - OPRAH.
Seriously, f you sent a printout of this stuff, I can't see her being able to ignore it.
Thank the universe that there are people like you maintaining vigilance.
Helen from Australia
Posted by: helen | January 08, 2010 at 12:50 AM
I agree with Helen, send all of this to OPRAH. Who in this world has more clout than her. I feel confident that she would be willing to expose these scammers.
Posted by: Rae | February 09, 2010 at 10:27 AM
This niche scam appears to be enormous. I was looking for natural remedies for Lichen Planus when I came across lichenplanusproducts.com, a site supposedly created by a humanitarian who wanted to share his personal "research" & experience with others by reviewing 4 good products for treating Lichen Planus, one of which is Plenical listed among the 56 products ending in "ical". Then I found this site, substituted names of 2 of the other medical conditions and found urethritisproducts.com & keratosisproducts.com. All 3 of the "products.com" sites I looked at have identically formatted website and graphics; only the names of the 4 "reviewed" products were different along with a small fraction of the text. Assuming similar feeder sites are out there for all of the 56 medical conditions, and each site reviews 4 "products", that's 224 scam sites. Unfortunately there may be many more than that. As I recall, the Internet originated in the USA as a way for Universities to easily communicate and foster research, yet be safe from people without a "need to know". I'm dumfounded that things seem so out of control now, that someone in a high "Internet" position somewhere can't just push a button and fry the servers that these scammers depend on.
Posted by: Charles | February 23, 2010 at 09:36 PM
Charles,
Yes. I have found some of the review sites. See here, here and here (and see all the other sites under the scams heading on the left-hand side of this site) . All-in-all I have found over 1,300 bad sites. Are they all connected? I dont know. Some of them definitely are.
Who owns the Internet? No-one. it is cross-border, so it is not fully regulated. Anyway. I imagine if whoever owns the Internet killed one scammer IP address, it would be easy enough to change it on the host and the scammers would be back in business in about ten minutes or so. Or they could switch out a fried server in slightly more time.
There needs to be proper legal ramifications for activities like this. If running a scam like this might cost 50 years in jail, rather than an IP address or fileserver; I guarantee you the scammers would think twice.
But it isnt.
OSM
Posted by: One Sick Mother | February 24, 2010 at 01:54 AM
hmmm. the links didn't take. Here they are:
http://onesickmother.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/07/spah-the-medical-scam-clearinghouse.html
http://onesickmother.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/08/herbal-product-reviews-scam.html
http://onesickmother.typepad.com/my_weblog/2009/08/towards-natural-health-scam.html
Posted by: One Sick Mother | February 24, 2010 at 02:35 PM