I think generally, people understand that
most people with an Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) cannot (easily) put
themselves in "another person's shoes". That is, they have a hard
time understanding what that other person may be feeling or thinking and how
things may be for that person. Many cannot even conceive of "walking a
mile in your shoes".
They are stuck in their own shoes
My son Joe, who is (high functioning) Autistic, would probably pass by someone who had collapsed on the street, thinking that person maybe chose to lay down right then and there; and if that is the case, who is he to say anything? An Autie such as Joe doesn't tend to factor in things like "normal behaviour" or "likelihood" into these scenarios, because to him, NTs are all so weird anyway. There is no telling what we might do! So who is he to question? However, if I explained to Joe that the person might be in trouble or distress, he would move Heaven and Earth to help them if he could.
Perspective is a funny thing.
Of course, most NT people in the same scenario would instantly figure there
is something wrong -even if the person had chosen to lay down right there! (OK the odds are that they didn't. But I'm just
saying...)
Most of us non-autistic people,
think we have good... whateveritis you want to call it: Theory of mind,
empathy, perspective-taking. Most of us think we can place ourselves in another
person's shoes and understand where they are coming from.
Sometimes we can. Sometimes we can't.
I have been thinking about this a
lot recently. One of the comments on the piece I wrote about Caster Semenya was
written by a man trapped in a woman's body. I tried to imagine what that might be
like (and I tried to imagine if I were trapped in a man's body). I
couldn't do it.
I can only imagine my body: My "shoes".
I didn't realize I was quite so
unimaginative until now. Now, I know that some experiences cannot be imagined
or described, but I thought I could manage simple enough ones like
"male" and "female".
But I can't because they are not
that simple at all. At least not for humans.
I remember years ago, reading an
interview with Stevie Wonder and he; although born blind, was saying that he
does "see" things in his head. Of course he cannot describe them to
anyone, having no knowledge of a sighted person's concept of (say)
"color"; indeed, having no sight references at all. So we cannot know
what he sees. I do wonder if he shares it, wittingly or unwittingly? I
wonder if his vision colors (pun intended) his music?
Interesting, no?
Recently, I watched the season
premier of Season 6 of "So You Think You Can Dance", which is one of my favorite
shows. Allison Becker, A deaf dancer auditioned in Phoenix. She was
great. What got me was that the judges were so flabbergasted that she was
great. They danced (pun intended) around the core issue until Mia Michaels finally came out and said in a somewhat roundabout way
what everybody else was thinking (I'm paraphrasing here):
"Why do you (how can you) dance when
you can't hear the music?"
The answer was simple.
"I hear it differently"
Then Nigel was waffling on about wanting
to see how she would do in choreography and again she just said
"I'll be great"
And she was. She killed the
choreography. Here is a link to the video.
(And although somewhat off topic, I
have to give a shout-out to the same-sex ballroom couple, whose video is here.)
There are some shoes we cannot
occupy. Some scenarios we cannot understand, no matter how we try. We cannot understand how a deaf woman hears or a
blind man sees. We cannot fully get what it is like to have Autism, ADHD, Dyxlexia
or OCD. We can try and understand it on an intellectual level, but we cannot
truly get it.
In a funny way, I thnk Joe has an advantage in this over me. He KNOWS that he doesn't get other
people. Therefore instead of trying to understand them, he usually just accepts them. He has no problem at all with
the concept of a deaf dancer. She's deaf, she dances: So what?
Whereas I, who consider myself an
empathetic person, find myself trying to understand instead of simply accepting. And
then I realized that I have been guilty of "Murakab" in my attempt to teach Joe about putting
yourself in other people's shoes. I had assumed that I could always do it, and
that one always should do it. I
didn't fully realize that there are times when one CAN'T do it. I didn't fully
understand that: Hence murakab, which means 'complex ignorance"; I didn't
know that I didn't know (as opposed to simple ignorance, where you know you
don't know).
I have now realized that there are times
when Joe's approach is better than mine. There are times when I cannot
-simply CANNOT place myself in another person's shoes. That does not mean their
experience is invalid (not that I ever thought it was). It just means that
instead of trying to project myself onto them, I will choose to accept them on
blind faith, like Joe does. That isn't easy for me.
Having just said that, however, if I ever do see a person collapsed on the
street, I will not assume they chose to lie down and take a nap.
(All the art in this piece is by Renee Magritte, 1898-1967)
Paula as always a great artical. As a mother waiting for a diagnosis for my child, autism or asperigous sydrome have been given as possibilitys, you've given me a lot to think about. If he is diagnosed with one of the above it would explain a lot about him. Keep them coming, please, I get a lot from your articals. Stay strong.
Posted by: Carmina Kearney | September 29, 2009 at 06:49 AM
I think you are very inspired by the shoes. thanxx.. 4 ur good article..
Posted by: Suwandi | September 29, 2009 at 06:51 AM
As for trying to relate to being in another's shoes I think the easiest way to do it is not to try to & do it in the standard way, but rather to imagine everyone else was different. For the transgender issue, instead of thinking what if on the inside you were male think if on the outside you had, say for example, your husband's body but still felt the exact same way. Or imagine the world was made up of Auties & you were one of the few NTs.
Being anything but "normal" is so very hard & while "normal" people say they are compassionate it often turns out they are only compassionate about others who are "normal" as well.
Posted by: queen-slug | September 29, 2009 at 09:40 AM
Thank you--great post.
Posted by: fridawrites | September 29, 2009 at 06:13 PM
Carmina,
Thanks for your comments. I wish you the best of luck with the diagnosis. I know it is a very tough thing to go through, although in my experience, the waiting was the hardest part. Once we officially knew what we were dealing with, a lot of doors opened and we were able to move on and get more done.
Swandi,
Nice way to get your link in there. I am keeping this one, because I am a sucker for shoes.
Q-S,
You know, I really tried. I could picture myself in his body, and imagined being bigger and stronger (and not dislocaty and exhausted all the time). And I liked the idea of having a willy for a bit -gotta say I always wondered what one of those felt like to own.
However I couldn't get into the "head" aspect of things: not the thought processes, or understanding how I would interact with the world in that body and how it would interact with me.
"...while "normal" people say they are compassionate it often turns out they are only compassionate about others who are "normal" as well."
OK in just one sentence, you just nailed exactly what it took me almost 1,000 words to fail to convey. ;)
OSM
Posted by: One Sick Mother | September 30, 2009 at 09:33 AM
Frida,
Thanks :)
Posted by: One Sick Mother | September 30, 2009 at 09:35 AM
I enjoyed this post. I think the acknowledgement that total understanding of a condition is important. I agree about that. But I also think that it is only the start of education. These are medical conditions, including the female gender in the male body (brain chemistry and brain journals have noted this as a chromosomal marker in mammals), one which has a medical protocol (more than many conditioins). Can I understand what it would be like to 'know' I am male? No. Can I 'get' 1% or 4% of a life where the bathroom mirror is where you go, "Oh right, I'm female" since your dreams or waking identity is that of male. Yes, since with things like hair loss and skin issues, I have a self image that I try to reconsile with the bathroom mirror. Do I 'get it', no, but it is a start, and I can listen.
The issue I find with the deaf dancer is that her dancing was secondary to how she imputed her information. BECAUSE she did not process the information by which she danced, THAT became the focus, not the alleged point of the show.
I work hard to put myself into others heads as part of the Postcard Project, whether sight impaired, hearing impaired, Autistic Spectrum, Color Blind, or Dyslexic, how do I create an experience which ends up with the same result? Smell instead of visual? Tactile? No, I don't know what the detailed frustrations are, but I wish I did.
Posted by: Elizabeth | October 07, 2009 at 07:11 AM